I should be doing promotion, but last month’s post about gun violence and pregnancy could have easily been written this month, only with different links to different real life horror stories. Book banning efforts have also taken a darker turn, and I’ve obviously got a lot to say about that. Here’s a rundown:

Getting real tired of paranoid men shooting people for BS reasons. A big part of the problem is fear mongering by politicians and the media, often with thinly veiled racist tropes dating as far back as Reconstruction. Former VP Mike Pence said, “I can’t help but suspect that this recent spate of tragedies is evidence of the fear that so many Americans are feeling about the crime wave besetting this country”, perpetuating a false narrative to incite the next shooter. There is no crime wave, though shooting deaths are rising, especially in states that continue to remove restrictions. It’s now the leading cause of death among children (this figure includes accidental shootings and suicide).

It seems the more machinery allows us to distance ourselves from others – be it guns, cars, or even (especially?) computers – the easier it becomes to disregard their humanity. I’ve been working to control my own temper driving. It helps that I no longer live in a state that’s miserably hot or have a long commute. I prefer to limit driving. I don’t live in fear of car accidents, but fatal car accidents are twice as common as homicides. I live in even less fear of crime, and I won’t introduce a daily danger into my life and the lives of my family out of paranoia. Meanwhile there’s big strapping men who don’t feel safe unless they’re strapped. I don’t oppose responsible gun ownership. I just don’t trust fearful people to be responsible. I trust people who are quicker to defend their guns than people even less.

Many of those with a loose interpretation of the Second Amendment have an increasingly narrow interpretation of the First. They’ve moved from book bans to trying to do away with school and public libraries, whose services extend well beyond books and include things like computer access or job and healthcare assistance for the poor. A school administrator in Virginia said libraries were unneeded because children can access books on their smartphones. Some children are too young for smartphones. Others don’t even have smartphones. Again, that’s why public libraries provide additional services to communities like computer access. The real goal is maintaining social hierarchies. It’s not about “parent rights” when a few are given power over the many – just like “school choice” is about funding the educations of children from affluent families who can already afford private school at the expense of children from poor families left with even fewer choices.

That’s part of why you may have noticed people saying it’s not about the books. It’s also an attack on what books (and libraries) provide, like resources that can lift people from poverty. And not just literacy and information, but also insight, empathy, comfort. Even discomfort. Yes, we need material that challenges us, too. Growth doesn’t happen in our comfort zone. But some people don’t want to confront unpleasant realities that require nuance. They’d rather hide the truth, and replace it with a tidy narrative even as they deny others any sources of comfort or catharsis. Representation (and participation) in the arts – be it art, literature, movies, music – helps people feel seen and less alone. And it’s a more honest depiction of our world.

On a related matter, a Montana politician made the chilling decision to share, unprovoked, she’d rather lose a child to suicide than support them in a debate over trans rights. Her stance is horrifying enough but she seeks to codify it, and force it on other parents who don’t view their children as property.

I continue to question the sincerity of people’s concern for the unborn when there’s so little regard for life in every other context. There’s been a lot of stories of forced pregnancies in which the fetus has anencephaly or other fatal defects over the years, and this is the latest. Anti-abortion activists celebrate Texas law working as intended, confirming cruelty is the point. And while Florida is fine with minimizing children as collateral damage of the Second Amendment, they decided an embryo has more civil liberties than the person it’s inside. Voters in other states pushed back against regressive legislation. Maybe the tide is turning, but it’s shame how many have been harmed or forced to share their pain. I can’t give anyone who supports interfering in private medical decisions the benefit of the doubt anymore.

alywelch

If the writing thing doesn't work out, my backup plans include ninja, rock star, or international jewel thief.